|
EFFECT OF PARTIAL SUCKLING ON MILK YIELD OF
SOMALI DOES AND GROWTH RATE OF THEIR OFFSPRING
Fekede Feyissa 1 and Girma Abebe2
1EARO, Holleta
Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
2Awassa College of Agriculture, P.O. Box 5, Awassa, Ethiopia
Abstract
An experiment was carried out using 24 Somali does
with the aim of developing a milking technique that optimally balances milk
for family use and proper kid growth. Two regimes of partial suckling were
used. In the first milking method (MM1), milk was estimated in the morning and
late afternoon, and for the second method (MM2) milk was estimated only in the
morning after an overnight separation of kids from dams. MM2 provided more
milk (21.5%) for dairy use and promoted greater kid growth than MM1. Milking
method influenced (P<0.01) the amount of milk harvested by hand only. Weaning
weight averaged 27.5% greater for MM2 vs MM1.
Introduction
The small size of goats
makes them highly suitable for milk production in areas where land available
per household is insufficient for large dairy animals. A survey made
by FARM Africa (1996) revealed the importance of goats as milk producing animals.
Goat milk is usually part of the staple diet in all pastoral areas and provides
the only milk for children of the poorest families in southern Ethiopia. Although
the value of goats as milk producing animals has long been realized by pastoralists
in the lowlands, such a recognition is a recent development in densely populated
regions of Ethiopia where land holding per household is very small and feed
supplies are often inadequate to keep dual purpose cattle.
Milk from the dam is a
critical dietary component for growing kids because they are entirely dependent
on milk until about 8 weeks of age. Intake of solid feed becomes significant
as the rumen develops. Until this time, kids must consume either goat milk
or an adequate milk replacer. Such replacers, usually made from dried skim
cow milk with added fat and carbohydrate of vegetable origin, are not likely
to be available and moreover are costly for small-scale farmers in Ethiopia.
Newly born kids must therefore rely on the milk of their dams.
In circumstances (small-scale
production) where milk is required both for family consumption as well as for
proper growth of young kids, a balance must be sought where the two differing
production objectives are optimized. Hence, the objective of this study was
to identify appropriate milking and(or) suckling methods suitable for small-scale
goat milk producers and also for support reasonable kid growth.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Animals and Management
The experiment was started
with a total of 24 Somali does with single kids. Most of the does were in their
first or second parity and had kidded in almost the same season. Does were
divided into two groups considering parity, sex and genotype of the kid. Does
were allowed to graze during daytime, and concentrate supplement was provided
at 300 g/day. Kids were kept in the barn and were exposed to forage and supplementary
concentrate starting at 2 weeks of age.
2.2 Milk Recording
Two regimes of partial
suckling were used, starting at approximately 1 week after kidding and lasting
for a 16-week period. For does in milking method 1 (MM1), milk was estimated
twice daily in the morning (07:00 hour) and late in the afternoon (18:00 hour).
Kids were completely separated from their dams except in the morning and the
evening partial suckling period. The procedure combined hand milking and the
weigh-suckle-weigh method. A half-udder was milked by hand as completely as
possible, while the kid sucked the other half. The sum of the milk obtained
directly by hand milking and indirectly by the weigh-suckle-weigh method was
recorded as the daily milk yield for each doe. In the second milking method
(MM2), the same procedures were followed as for MM1, but milk recording was
once daily in the morning (07:00 hour). MM2 kids had access to their dams at
mid-day and late in the afternoon before the overnight separation. Thus, the
sum of the milk obtained through hand milking and the weigh-suckle-weigh method
in the morning was doubled to get an estimate of the daily yield of each doe.
Does observed with clinical symptoms of mastitis or any other problem (e.g.,
death of kid) were excluded from the trial, but their milk records were considered
in the analysis for the recording period.
2.3 Statistical Analysis
The General Linear Model
(GLM) procedures of the SAS (1992) were used. The independent variable included
in the model was milking method. Differences among least-square means were
determined by contrast statement of the GLM procedure.
3. Results and discussions
3.1 Milk Yield
The mean weekly milk yield
obtained by the two milking methods is presented in Figure 1. Weekly milk yield
varied from 5.57 kg in week 1 to 4.5 kg in week 16 for MM2 and from 4.89 to
3.47 kg for MM1.
As shown in the graph,
MM2 does produced more milk than did MM1 does throughout the 16 weeks of lactation.
Average lactation yield was 21.5% greater for goats of the MM2 treatment. Frequent
suckling of kids of this group might have contributed to the higher milk yield,
confirming the fact that lactation yield is affected by milking frequency, with
frequent withdrawal stimulating additional secretion. Another possible explanation
for the yield difference, requiring further study, is the potential for difference
between the morning and the evening yields since yield for MM2 does was estimated
by doubling morning yield.
3.2 Milk for Human Consumption and Kid Growth
In almost all cases milk
recorded through the weigh-suckling-weigh method was greater (P < 0.001)
than harvested by hand (Table 1), suggesting milk let-down refusal with hand
milking of Somali does. Average milk suckled by MM1 and MM2 kids was 3.55 ±
0.22 and 3.87 ± 0.29 kg, respectively. The proportion of milk harvested by
hand was 17% of total milk yield for MM1 and 26.5% for MM2.

Table 1. Weekly milk production obtained through
hand milking (HM) and kid suckling (KS)
|
Week
|
MM1
|
|
MM2
|
| |
HM
|
KS
|
Total
|
% HM
|
|
HM
|
KS
|
Total
|
% HM
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
1.13
|
3.77
|
4.90
|
23.1
|
|
2.02
|
3.55
|
5.57
|
36.3
|
|
2
|
1.00
|
3.76
|
4.76
|
21.0
|
|
1.84
|
3.58
|
5.42
|
33.9
|
|
3
|
0.98
|
3.69
|
4.67
|
21.0
|
|
2.25
|
3.76
|
6.01
|
37.4
|
|
4
|
0.90
|
3.66
|
4.56
|
19.7
|
|
1.67
|
3.88
|
5.55
|
30.1
|
|
5
|
0.85
|
3.52
|
4.37
|
19.5
|
|
1.75
|
3.64
|
5.39
|
32.5
|
|
6
|
0.89
|
3.65
|
4.54
|
19.6
|
|
1.81
|
3.7
|
5.51
|
32.8
|
|
7
|
0.85
|
3.71
|
4.56
|
18.6
|
|
2.11
|
4.72
|
6.82
|
30.8
|
|
8
|
0.82
|
3.68
|
4.50
|
18.2
|
|
2.16
|
4.24
|
6.40
|
33.8
|
|
9
|
0.75
|
3.80
|
4.55
|
16.5
|
|
1.86
|
4.00
|
5.86
|
31.7
|
|
10
|
0.61
|
3.71
|
4.32
|
14.1
|
|
1.66
|
3.88
|
5.54
|
30.0
|
|
11
|
0.48
|
3.36
|
3.84
|
12.5
|
|
1.54
|
3.76
|
5.30
|
29.1
|
|
12
|
0.40
|
3.44
|
3.84
|
10.4
|
|
1.06
|
3.60
|
4.66
|
22.7
|
|
13
|
0.36
|
3.47
|
3.83
|
9.40
|
|
0.60
|
3.92
|
4.52
|
13.3
|
|
14
|
0.36
|
3.27
|
3.63
|
9.90
|
|
0.33
|
3.84
|
4.17
|
7.9
|
|
15
|
0.36
|
3.17
|
3.53
|
10.2
|
|
0.34
|
4.01
|
4.35
|
7.8
|
|
16
|
0.39
|
3.08
|
3.47
|
11.2
|
|
0.60
|
3.90
|
4.50
|
13.3
|
3.3 Weight Development
Preweaning kid weights
are shown in Figure 2. The average weaning weight of kids reared by MM1 and
MM2 does was 11.3 and 14.2 kg, respectively. Weaning weight of MM2 kids was
27.5% greater than for MM1 kids, presumably because of greater daily milk availability
and consumption with MM2.
|
|
 |
Throughout the lactation period kids reared under MM2
were heavier than those under MM1. Generally, the effect of milking method on
kid weight was cumulative. That is, during early lactation (e.g., first 6 weeks)
kid weights were not significantly different. But, weight differences became
more pronounced with advancing stage of growth. This finding agrees with that
of Ruvuna et al. (1988), in which partial suckling did not affect growth of kids
of east African goat breeds up to 4 weeks of age. It appears that in early lactation
does produce more milk than required for acceptable kid growth.
4. Conclusion
Because of the amount of
total milk produced by does, weight development of kids and the amount of milk
harvested for human consumption, milking method 2 is recommended. This method
is also less labor intensive, allowing small-scale goat farmers to harvest milk
only once in the morning after an overnight separation and leaving remaining
milk for the growing kids. Thus, until further studies are conducted with alternative
milking methods, small-scale dairy goat farmers should consider harvesting milk
once daily, and leaving remaining milk for kids.
References
Farm Africa, 1996. Dairy Goat Development Program, Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ruvuna performance of goats and growth rates of kids
under different milking and rearing methods, F., Cartwright, T.C., Blackburn,
H., Okeyo, M. and Chema, S. 1988. Lactation in Kenya. Animal prod. 46; 237-242
SAS, 1992. System for Linear Models, Third Ed. SAS.
Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Citation:
Feyissa, F. and G. Abebe. 2000. Effect of partial suckling on milk yield of
Somali does and growth rate of their offspring. In: R.C. Merkel, G. Abebe and
A.L. Goetsch (eds.). The Opportunities and Challenges of Enhancing Goat Production
in East Africa. Proceedings of a conference held at Debub University, Awassa,
Ethiopia from November 10 to 12, 2000. E (Kika) de la Garza Institute for Goat
Research, Langston University, Langston, OK pp. 212-216.
|