NUTRITIONAL CONSTRAINTS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR GOAT PRODUCTION IN EAST AFRICA
Adugna
Tolera1, Roger C. Merkel2, Arthur L. Goetsch2,
Tilahun Sahlu2and Tegene Negesse1
1Debub
University, Awassa College of Agriculture, P. O. Box 5, Awassa, Ethiopia
2E
(Kika) de la Garza Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, P.O. Box
730, Langston, OK 73050, USA
Abstract
Goats are primarily owned
by smallholder farmers and pastoralists and contribute significantly to the
economy and food supply of the poorest sectors of the society. However, goat
production in East Africa is characterized by low productivity levels due mainly
to nutritional constraints. Grazing and browsing on natural pastures is the
main source of feed in the arid and semi-arid pastoral areas, while crop residues
could contribute up to 50% of the total feed supply in areas where mixed crop-livestock
production is the dominant farming system. The quantity and quality of fodder
available from natural pasture shows seasonal fluctuation. There is an acute
shortage of feed supply during the dry season and the available feed during
this period is of very poor quality. Poor nutrition results in low production
and reproductive performance, slow growth rate, loss of body condition and increased
susceptibility to diseases and parasites. Thus, effective utilization of the
available feed resources (agricultural and agro-industrial byproducts, natural
pastures and browse) and appropriate supplementation of poor quality natural
pasture and crop residue based diets appear to be the necessary steps to alleviate
the nutritional problems of goats in the region. Different supplementation strategies
could be applied depending upon the type, accessibility and price of supplementary
feeds in a given area. Fodder conservation practices, particularly hay making,
should be developed in order to enable a stable supply of feed throughout the
year. Evaluation of the nutritive value of naturally occurring tree leaves and
pods, which are commonly used as dry season feed resources, would be important
to enhance their proper utilization.
1. Introduction
The majority (95%) of the worlds
goat population is found in developing countries. Of the total world population
of 674.1 million goats, approximately 26.2% are found in Africa. East Africa
contains 38.9 and 10.2% of the African and world goat population, respectively
(Table 1). Goats are primarily owned by smallholder farmers and pastoralists
and contribute significantly to the economy and food supply of the poorest sectors
of the society. According to Okello et al. (1996), goats provide about 23% of
the total red meat produced in Uganda and goat meat is preferred to beef in
terms of palatability and delicacy. Besides of their significant contributions
to the economy and food supply of resource poor farmers, their specific biological
features such as feeding behaviour, reproductive efficiency and small body size
are important characteristics for integrating goats into pastoral and sedentary
smallholder production systems.
Table 1. Goat population and production of
goat meat and milk in East Africa
|
Country / Region
|
Goat population (x 1000)
|
Meat production
(1000 MT)
|
Milk production
(1000 MT)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Djibouti
|
507
|
2
|
-
|
|
Eritrea
|
1,400
|
5
|
7
|
|
Ethiopia
|
16,700
|
62
|
93
|
|
Kenya
|
7,400
|
29
|
93
|
|
Somalia
|
12,500
|
36
|
14
|
|
Sudan
|
16,900
|
39
|
415
|
|
Tanzania
|
9,682
|
24
|
645
|
|
Uganda
|
3,500
|
15
|
-
|
|
East Africa
|
68,589
|
212
|
1,267
|
|
Africa
|
176,401
|
670
|
2,078
|
|
World
|
674,139
|
3,562
|
10,144
|
|
Share of East Africa
|
|
|
|
|
% of Africa
|
38.9
|
31.6
|
61.0
|
|
% of World
|
10.2
|
6.0
|
12.5
|
Source: FAO, 1997
Goat production in East Africa is
characterized by low productivity levels in terms of growth rate, meat production
and reproductive performance. Goat meat production in east Africa is only 31.6
and 6% of the goat meat produced in Africa and in the World, respectively (Table
1). Many factors contribute to such low productivity levels. However, poor nutrition
is the most important factor. This paper deals with the nutritional constraints
and the possible mechanisms of alleviating the constraints.
2. Nutritional Constraints
Nutritional constraints
to improved goat production include inadequate feed supply, low feeding value
of the available feed resources and reduced efficiency of utilization of the
available feed resources. Grazing and browsing on natural pastures and poor
quality crop residues are the main sources of feed in most parts of the region.
Due to seasonality of rainfall distribution, there is a marked seasonal variation
in the quantity and quality of feed supply. There is an acute shortage of feed
supply during the dry season and the available feeds during this period are
of very poor quality (low in protein and high in fiber content), which results
in low digestibility and low voluntary intake by animals. Seasonal shortage
of forage on small farms in western Kenya is considered to be a constraint for
goat production due to small farm size and overstocking of livestock (Onim et
al., 1992; Oteino et al., 1992). In a Participatory Rural Appraisal, low DM
intake from grazed forages during the rainy season and uncertain availability
and high cost of oil seed cakes were identified to be the main nutritional constraints
for dairy goat production in the Uluguru mountains in Tanzania (Ingratubun et
al., 2000). The problem is aggravated by a lack of alternative feeds during
the critical period. Poor nutrition results in low production and reproductive
performance and slow growth rate in growing animals. Undernourished animals
are susceptible to diseases and parasites and in extreme cases animals lose
body condition and could eventually die.
In the highland and mid-altitude
mixed farming areas, the land available for natural grazing and browsing is
rapidly decreasing due to the increasing human population and increasing demand
for cropping land (Said and Tolera, 1991; Oteino et al., 1992). However, stubble
grazing and crop residues could be used as important sources of feed in these
situations. For example, in many places of the Ethiopian highlands, cereal crop
residues (straws and stovers) are collected and stored by stacking and are fed
to animals during the dry season when both the quantity and quality of available
fodder from the natural pastures declines drastically. However, effective utilization
of crop residues as animal feed is also limited by their seasonal supply and
poor nutritive value (low nutrient content, poor digestibility and low voluntary
intake by animals).
Deficiencies of protein
and energy are the main nutritional factors limiting productivity of goats in
the region. An active microbial population in the rumen is essential to digest
and extract the nutrients contained in fibrous feedstuffs. However, when the
protein content of the pasture falls below 6-7% during the dry season, ruminal
microbial growth (i.e., reproduction) and digestion are limited. This directly
restricts protein and energy absorbed by the animal. Furthermore, conditions
associated with an insufficient nitrogen supply for ruminal microbes, such as
low microbial protein synthesis and intestinal amino acid absorption can limit
forage intake, further impairing animal performance (i.e., growth, capacity
for maintaining live weight and reproduction). Supplying additional protein
during the dry season will increase the microbial growth and rate of fiber digestion
often with increased forage intake, thereby improving nutrient absorption for
enhanced animal productivity. Indeed before making other supplementation considerations,
in most instances, it is most practical and economical to first correct nitrogen
deficiencies for ruminal microbes for increased supplies of energy-yielding
substrates and amino acids available for use by the host animal. However, in
addition to amino acids absorbed in the small intestine of microbial origin,
some proteins of feedstuffs are not degraded in the rumen and reach the intestine
intact. Furthermore, feedstuffs vary considerably in the proportion of protein
not degraded by ruminal microbes, often termed as bypass or escape protein.
For some animals with high production potential, performance can in some instances
be elevated beyond that achieved by correcting a ruminal nitrogen deficiency
by adding a feedstuff high in escape protein to further increase amino acid
absorption and availability to the animal. However, it is important to note
that both energy and amino acids are required for protein synthesis by growing
animals. Thus, use of high dietary levels of escape protein may necessitate
an increase in energy absorption greater than achieved by only correcting the
ruminal nitrogen deficiency.
3. Feeding Strategies to Alleviate Nutritional
Constraints and Enhance Productivity
3.1 Provision of Supplementary Feed
Because
of their inherent nutrient deficiencies, poor quality pastures and cereal crop
residues, the main feed resources in East Africa, cannot sustain effective animal
production or even maintenance when fed alone, particularly during the dry season.
Thus, provision of appropriate supplementary feedstuffs would be an important
step to enhance the productivity of goats under smallholder and pastoral production
systems of East Africa. Various studies conducted so far on small ruminants
have indicated that it is possible to enhance productivity or at least avoid
body weight loss during the critical feed shortage periods of the year by supplementing
poor quality pastures and crop residues with small quantities of high quality
supplements. For instance, Okello et al. (1996) reported that goats fed on unsupplemented
elephant grass lost body weight whereas supplementation with cottonseed cake,
maize bran or banana peels increased body weight gain (Table 2).
3.1.1 Concentrate Supplementation
Supplementary
concentrates such as oil seed cakes, cereals and cereal byproducts provide readily
fermentable carbohydrates, nitrogen and other essential nutrients. Besides supplying
the deficient nutrients to affect the quantities of nutrients absorbed, it is
also possible that some effects of supplemental feedstuffs are due to changes
in the array of nutrients available to host tissues, which impact efficiency
of nutrient absorption. In the middle Rift Valley area of Ethiopia, Ebro et
al. (1998) reported that supplementation of grazing goats with concentrate and(or)
lablab hay resulted in a 23.6% increase in live weight gain compared with unsupplemented
goats and that there was no significant difference between concentrate and lablab
hay supplements in live weight gain. A study conducted on the effects of various
supplements (i.e., cotton seed cake, maize bran, banana peels and leucaena leaves)
on weight gain and carcass characteristics of male Mubende goats fed elephant
grass ad libitum in Uganda (Okello et al., 1996) showed that the goats
supplemented with cotton seed cake had the highest growth rate, which was attributed
to a higher protein and energy supply from the cottonseed cake. Moreover, supplementation
with cottonseed cake and maize bran improved body condition scores and carcass
weight compared with the other diets (Table 2).
Tessema
and Emojong (1984) reported that the body weight gains of sheep and goats grazing
pasture in a dryland region of Kenya were increased when urea, molasses and
minerals were added to supplemental maize stover. A study conducted in Lesotho
(Ngambi and Kekena-Monare, 1996) showed that spraying molasses on wheat straw
increased voluntary intake of straw by 37% without affecting digestibility.
Based on the results, spraying palatable molasses on unpalatable or poorly palatable
straw was recommended as a practical method of improving the feeding value of
poor quality roughages.
Table 2. Dry matter (DM) intake, body weight (BW) change,
body condition score and carcass characteristics of male intact Mubende goats
fed elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) with or without supplements
of Leucaena leucocephala leaves, maize bran, banana peels and cottonseed
cake (Okello et al., 1996)
|
Parameters
|
Elephant grass (E) (Control)
|
Elephant grass + Leucaena leaves
|
Elephant grass + Maize bran
|
Elephant grass + Banana peels
|
Elephant grass + Cotton seed cake
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DM intake (g/d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elephant grass
|
404
|
335
|
311
|
356
|
336
|
|
Supplement
|
|
119
|
222
|
127
|
175
|
|
Total
|
404
|
454
|
533
|
483
|
511
|
|
BW gain (kg)
|
-0.6
|
-0.7
|
1.2
|
2.2
|
5.6
|
|
Body condition score
|
1.3
|
1.0
|
1.5
|
1.3
|
2.5
|
|
Empty BW (kg)
|
10.4
|
11.6
|
14.3
|
11.5
|
16.8
|
|
Dressed carcass wt (kg)
|
5.6
|
6.6
|
8.4
|
6.1
|
9.5
|
|
Dressing percentage
|
53.5
|
56.7
|
58.5
|
53.0
|
57.0
|
However,
concentrates are expensive and not readily available in most developing countries.
In some East African countries there is a shortage of cereal grains even for
human consumption. Agro-industrial byproducts (oil seed cakes and byproducts
from cereal processing plants) are in short supply and the availability is limited
mainly to the vicinity of the urban centers where the processing plants are
located and may not be easily accessible to smallholder farmers, who are scattered
in the countryside. The existing poor road network and inadequate transportation
facilities exacerbate the problem of distribution of concentrate feeds in the
countryside. In general, supplementation with conventional sources of protein
and energy is expensive and could usually put ruminant production in direct
competition with human beings and monogastric farm animals. According to Anderson
(1987) Ethiopia has only limited supplies of oil seed cakes and molasses, which
even when efficiently used, cannot boost production for more than a small proportion
of the ruminant livestock in the country. Moreover, most smallholder farmers
scattered in the rural areas may not have the necessary economic incentives
to use concentrate feeds to increase animal productivity. Thus, critical economic
feasibility studies may be worthwhile in goat producing areas where agro-industrial
byproducts such as oil seed cakes and molasses are available within the vicinity
of the goat farms.
3.1.2 Supplementation with Forage Legumes
Supplementation
with forage legumes may include supplementation with herbaceous and shrubby
or tree legumes. Forage legumes can enhance the utilization of poor quality
roughages in smallholder mixed farming systems. They are rich in protein (both
fermentable and bypass protein depending upon the level of tannins) and other
nutrients such as minerals and vitamins. In systems with minimal fertilizer
inputs, forage legumes have the added advantage of improving soil fertility
by fixing nitrogen and thereby enhancing crop yield and reducing the rate of
soil fertility decline. Reynolds (1989) reported results from a study in which
four levels (200, 400, 800 and 1200 g) of a 1:1 (w/w) mixture of Leucaena
leucocephala and Gliricidia sepium supplemented pregnant and lactating
Dwarf West African goats fed a basal diet of chopped Panicum maximum
plus 50 g of sun-dried cassava peels. Kids were also supplemented after weaning
with a reduced level of the browse mixture proportional to their size. At 16-20
wk of age they were given 16 g of cassava peels and 62.5, 125, 250 and 375 g
of the browse mixture, whereas the amount of cassava peels increased to 20 g/day
and the browse mixture increased to 75, 150, 300 and 450 g at 20-24 wk of age.
Browse intake of dams and kids and survival and growth rate of the kids increased
with increasing level of supplementation (Table 3). Moreover, productivity (weight
of kid weaned/doe/year) increased by 0.64 kg for each 100 g of browse consumed
by the does (Reynolds, 1989).
Table 3. The effects of leucaena and gliricidia browse supplementation on growth
and survival rates of West African Dwarf goats (ILCA, 1988; Reynolds, 1989)
|
Treatment groups*
|
Browse intake (g DM/d)
|
|
Growth rate (g/d)
|
Survival rate to 24 wk
|
|
Dam
|
Kids
|
|
Birth-16 wk
|
16-24 wk
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
143
|
39
|
|
17.4
|
14.0
|
0.36
|
|
2
|
254
|
83
|
|
28.7
|
20.1
|
0.46
|
|
3
|
554
|
160
|
|
25.9
|
20.9
|
0.82
|
|
4
|
719
|
246
|
|
31.9
|
28.3
|
0.94
|
Table
4 shows that supplementation of goats fed a basal diet of Napier grass with
sun wilted tree foliage stimulated growth rate. Additional benefits have occurred
when protected soybean meal was supplemented. Wilting or drying improves the
feeding value of the foliage from fodder trees. This may be due to increase
supplemental protein reaching the intestine intact because of decreased solubility
in ruminal fluid or perhaps formation of initial Browning reaction products
that are not degraded by ruminal microorganisms but are available in the intestines
(Leng, 1997). In addition, a reduction in anti-nutritive factors may also have
had impact.
Table 4. Effect of supplementary dry foliage and/or protected protein (formaldehyde
treated soybean meal [SBM]) on growth rate of goats fed a basal Napier grass
diet (van Eys et al., 1986, cited by Norton, 1994)
|
Napier grass intake
(g/kg BW/d)
|
Supplement intake and type
(g/kg BW/d)
|
Gain
(g/d)
|
| |
|
|
|
33.4
|
0
|
-1
|
|
29.4
|
4.2 (Gliricidia sepium)
|
20
|
|
29.1
|
4.2 (Leucaena leucocephala)
|
22
|
|
26.1
|
3.9 (L. leucocephala) +
(2.7 g/kg SBM)
|
45
|
|
30.2
|
4.1 (Sesbania grandiflora)
|
20
|
|
33.6
|
3.8 (S. grandiflora) + (2.7
g/kg SBM)
|
52
|
A
study conducted at Awassa College of Agriculture in southern Ethiopia (Tolera
and Sundstøl, 2000) showed that supplementation of sheep fed a basal diet of
maize stover with Desmodium intortum hay improved total dry matter, crude
protein and metabolizable energy intakes, nitrogen retention and body weight
gain of the animals (Table 5). The animals fed unsupplemented maize stover had
inadequate intake of crude protein and metabolizable energy resulting in negative
nitrogen balance and body weight loss. Thus, provision of sufficient amounts
and the right combination of protein and energy appears to be a critical factor
for enhancing productivity of goats. The use of fodder from both herbaceous
and shrubby or tree legumes as a supplement of crop residues and poor quality
pastures creates an opportunity to minimize body weight losses during the dry
season and to enhance productivity. Integration of forage legume production
into small-scale mixed farming systems could improve soil fertility, crop yields
and herbage quality, making the system more productive and sustainable.
Table 5. Dry matter (DM), crude protein and metabolizable
energy intake, nitrogen retention and body weight gain of sheep fed a basal
diet of maize stover supplemented with graded levels of Desmodium intortum
hay (Tolera and Sundstøl, 2000)
|
Variable
|
Level of supplementation (g/head/day)
|
|
0
|
150
|
300
|
450
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DM intake (g/kg W0.75/day)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maize stover
|
43.2
|
38.5
|
33.6
|
22.9
|
|
Total diet
|
43.2
|
53.8
|
63.1
|
66.3
|
|
Crude protein intake (g/head/day)
|
12.1
|
29.8
|
47.2
|
62.4
|
|
Nitrogen retention (g/day)
|
-2.2
|
0.1
|
1.7
|
4.4
|
|
Metabolizable energy intake (MJ/day)
|
1.9
|
3.9
|
5.3
|
6.4
|
|
Body weight change (g/day)
|
-32
|
9
|
34
|
44
|
To make supplementation
adaptable by smallholders the production of forage legumes should be integrated
into the existing production system without markedly increasing competition
for land and other resources. The following are different mechanisms of achieving
this goal.
a)
Use of legumes in crop mixtures:
Intercropping of forage legumes with cereals tends to increase the crude protein
level of the total fodder available after grain harvest of the primary crop.
This usually involves undersowing of a cereal crop with legumes after the cereal
crop is fully established to avoid competition.
b)
Fodder banks: Fodder banks are
concentrated units of legumes established by pastoralists adjacent to their
homesteads to serve as supplements to dry season grazing.
c)
Use of forage legumes in crop
rotation: The association of forage legumes in crop rotation has the added advantage
of improving the nitrogen status of the soil, thereby benefiting crop production
as well.
d)
Incorporation of adaptable, productive and nutritious forage tree
legumes in the farming system: Forage tree legumes could be established in the
form of alley farming, as hedge rows or as a fence line around the homestead
and along the borders of cropland or as a fodder bank. The leaves of trees can
be used as high quality supplements to crop residues and poor quality grass.
The level of incorporation may range from 20-75% depending upon the nutritive
value of the basal roughage diet and the supplement and the desired level of
animal productivity.
e)
Incorporation of trees that have
both food and feed value into the farming system. Pigeon pea is an example of
a leguminous tree that could serve both as a source of human food (the pods)
and as animal feed (the leaves).
However,
the extent to which farmers adopt production of high quality perennial forages
and fodder trees depends on security of land tenure and on availability of labor
and planting materials at the right time. Moreover, the willingness and commitment
of smallholder farmers to invest in supplementary feed or forage improvement
measures depends upon availability of market outlets and favorable price margins
for livestock and livestock products, in this case goats.
3.1.3 Legume Straw
Supplementation
Legume
crop residues (cowpeas, peas, peanuts etc.) are relatively high in protein (about
10% or more) and, thus, they can serve as supplements of low quality roughages
such as poor quality pastures and cereal crop residues. Macala et al. (1996)
studied the effect of supplementing three (0, 300 and 600 g/day) levels of peanut
hay on the performance of lactating Tswana does grazing natural pastures during
the dry season and on the growth rate of their kids (Table 6). Supplementation
of does with peanut hay resulted in higher daily gain and milk production compared
with unsupplemented does. The amount of milk produced increased with increasing
amounts of peanut hay supplemented. Moreover, kids that were supplemented with
peanut hay had higher daily weight gain and final weight at weaning.
3.1.4 Other Feedstuffs Used as Supplements
There
is a variety of agricultural and agro-industrial byproducts that could be used
as supplementary feedstuffs depending upon the production system of a given
area. Brewery byproducts and household wastes constitute important sources of
supplementary feed. This is particularly important for farmers residing in the
proximity of commercial breweries or for landless farmers maintaining a small
number of dairy or dual-purpose goats. In addition to commercial breweries,
small scale home brewing is also practiced in most localities and villages.
There is a tradition of feeding the byproducts from home brewed beverages to
lactating animals in different parts of Ethiopia in order to increase milk production.
Reject fruit and vegetables could also be an important source of feed for goats
in areas where horticultural crops are grown and marketed. Dropped coffee leaves
could be a minor source of feed, whereas coffee pulp and hulls represent a relatively
underutilized feed resource in coffee growing areas.
Other
agricultural byproducts such as sweet potato vines, cassava leaves, banana leaves
and peels, sugar cane leaves and enset (Ensete ventricosum) leaves could
also serve as important sources of supplementary feed during the dry season.
Sweet potato is traditionally grown to provide tubers for human consumption
and the vines can be used as useful supplementary feed for goats in areas where
the crop is grown. Sweet potato vines have a high nutritive value, with a crude
protein content of over 20% and a digestibility of about 70% (Oteino et al.,
1992). Because of very high water content (86%), sweet potato vine is more appropriate
for growing kids than for lactating does. Goats on sweet potato vines do not
require additional free water. However, when the vine is offered to a lactating
doe as a sole diet it can only support sub optimal levels of production because
of DM intake limitations. Enset leaves and byproducts play a significant role
in supplementing the diet of farm animals, especially in drought years, in the
enset growing areas of southern Ethiopia.
Table 6. Performance of lactating Tswana goats supplemented with different levels
of peanut hay and growth rate of kids suckling these does (Macala et al., 1996).
|
Variables
|
Level of supplement (g)
|
|
0
|
300
|
600
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Does
|
|
|
|
|
Initial weight (kg)
|
37.0±2.0
|
37.7±2.0
|
36.9±2.0
|
|
Final weight (kg)
|
30.3±2.4
|
37.4±2.4
|
40.7±2.4
|
|
Weight change (kg)
|
-6.7±1.02
|
-0.3±1.02
|
3.8±1.02
|
|
Daily weight gain (g)
|
-72.8±0.01
|
-3.3±0.1
|
41.3±0.01
|
|
Milk yield (kg/day)
|
1.15±0.11
|
1.71±0.1
|
2.16±0.1
|
|
Kids
|
|
|
|
|
Initial weight (kg)
|
7.0±0.93
|
6.0±0.77
|
6.0±0.87
|
|
Final weight (kg)
|
11.6±0.76
|
14.6±0.64
|
17.5±0.71
|
|
Weight change (kg)
|
4.6±0.55
|
8.6±0.46
|
11.5±0.51
|
|
Daily gain (g)
|
50±11
|
93.5±0.01
|
125.0±0.01
|
3.1.5 Molasses-Urea Supplementation
Dry
mature pasture or cereal crop residues given alone are unbalanced in nutrients
and do not create the environment for efficient rumen function and thus do not
ensure an efficient utilization of absorbed nutrients. Feed intake and the nutrients
absorbed from such diets are insufficient to even meet the maintenance requirements
of the animals and thus animals are prone to lose weight if they do not receive
additional nitrogen and mineral supplements. Thus, supplementation with fermentable
nitrogen, energy and minerals enhances rumen microbial growth and voluntary
feed intake of animals fed low quality roughages. Molasses-urea blocks added
to such an unbalanced diet ensure animals maintenance requirements because
they enhance efficient ruminal fermentation. Anindo et al. (1998) showed that
supplementation of molasses-urea blocks improved the daily feed intake, body
weight gain and body condition score of grazing sheep in Ethiopian highlands.
The addition of bypass protein (e.g., cottonseed meal, noug cake) results in
a synergistic effect that could considerably improve the average daily gain
of ruminants, and they become much more efficient in using the available nutrients.
Moreover, molasses could serve as a carrier for urea and mineral supplements.
3.1.6 Mineral Supplementation
Mineral
deficiencies could result in depression of animal performance. According to
Kabaija and Little (1988) sub clinical mineral deficiencies are widespread and
responsible for yet unestimated, but probably great, economic losses in livestock
production. However, mineral status of grazing animals in most African countries
has received very little attention. In general, most forages and crop residues
used as livestock feed in the Rift Valley areas of Ethiopia are deficient or
marginal in sodium, phosphorus and copper (Kabaija and Little, 1988; Tolera
and Said, 1994; Abebe et al., 2000). Thus supplementation regimes involving
these elements are likely to produce beneficial results. A typical example would
be supplementation with multi-nutrient blocks. In some parts of southern Ethiopia,
local mineral soils such as Bole and Megadua may supply adequate
or even excess amounts of most of the essential minerals except phosphorus (Tolera
and Said, 1994).
3.1.7 Use of Poultry Litter as Supplementary Feed
Poultry
litter is a significant byproduct of poultry production, which is a mixture
of poultry excreta, bedding material, feathers, spilled feed, etc. Poultry litter
is high in crude protein, ranging from 15 to 35% of dry matter. Thus, poultry
litter can serve as a source of nitrogen in ruminant diets and the potentially
digestible nitrogenous compounds in the litter are very soluble and are rapidly
degraded to ammonia in the rumen. Moreover, poultry litter is characterized
by a high ash content and could be an excellent source of essential minerals
such as calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, sulfur and copper, thereby
lessening the need for mineral supplementation (Goetsch and Aiken, 2000). Thus,
poultry litter could play a significant role replacing protein concentrates
in goat feeding in areas where large- scale poultry production is practiced.
3.2 Strategic Use of Supplements
Feed
supplements such as concentrates, forage legumes and mineral supplements are
generally less abundant and more expensive than the basal roughage diets. Thus,
strategic and efficient use of small amounts of high quality supplements would
be vital to balance nutrient deficiencies, improve rumen function and enhance
the efficiency of feed utilization from low quality roughages. This could be
achieved by identifying and providing critical nutrients that are deficient
in the basal diet. The first priority would be to supply rumen microbes with
rumen degradable sources of nitrogen and other essential nutrients to enhance
fermentative digestion in the rumen. The efficiency of utilization of absorbed
nutrients and animal performance could be further enhanced by adding small amounts
of bypass protein (Preston and Leng, 1987).
Preferential
supplementation of the physiologically most vulnerable groups of animals with
the available high quality supplements would be another strategy to increase
the efficiency of utilization of limited resources. For instance, priority could
be given to lactating does or to pregnant animals during the last one-third
of the pregnancy period. In this way it could be possible to minimize losses
and increase overall productivity.
4. Fodder Conservation
The
benefits of improved fodder production cannot be fully realized unless there
is some form of fodder conservation for the dry season. Thus, it is important
to have a suitable fodder conservation method for smallholder farmers. Any surplus
forage should be conserved as hay, which could be used during the dry season
when both feed supply is scarce and feed quality is poor. Grasses and legumes
for making hay should be cut and left to dry in the field for two to three days.
Then the dried hay should be safely stored under a shade either after baling
or in a loose form. Fodder conservation can enable a stable supply of feed throughout
the year.
5. Effective Utilization
of Crop Residues
5.1 Generous Feeding
to Allow Selective Consumption
In
smallholder mixed farming systems, crop residues play an important role as livestock
feed. This is a situation that is likely to increase as more grazing land is
put under cultivation due to the rapidly increasing population pressure. However,
cereal crop residues are characterized by low nutrient content, high fiber content,
low digestibility and low voluntary intake. The nutritive value of crop residues
is influenced by stage of maturity at the time of harvest, plant morphological
components (leaf:stem ratio) and variety of the crop. The varietal differences
in the nutritive value of crop residues could be due to differences in the relative
proportions of the botanical fractions in the whole straw/stover and due to
differences between and within these fractions in their chemical composition,
digestibility and acceptability by animals.
The
smaller size of goats and sheep compared to cattle gives them an apparent disadvantage
because maintenance energy requirement relative to live weight is higher for
small ruminants compared with large ruminants, while intake capacity for roughage
feeds is not. Under conditions of grazing/browsing, this size-linked disadvantage
is alleviated by the ability of goats and sheep to select a more nutritious
diet than their counterpart cattle. Goats are the most selective feeders of
domestic ruminants. A study conducted on barley straw and sorghum stover showed
that goats and sheep, when given the opportunity to select, are able to select
the more nutritious leaf and leaf sheath components and against the less nutritious
stem (Aboud et al., 1991, 1993; Owen, 1994). The same study showed that offering
crop residues to goats and sheep at 50% refusal rate, instead of the conventional
10-20% rate, resulted in increased feed intake (both quantitatively and qualitatively)
and body weight gain (Table 7).
Table 7. Effect of amount of chopped sorghum stover offered on DM intake and
growth rate of goats in Ethiopia (Aboud et al., 1991)
|
Parameters
|
Amount of stover offered (g/kg BW/d)
|
|
Goats
|
|
Sheep
|
|
25
|
50
|
75
|
|
25
|
50
|
75
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number/treatment
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
|
8
|
8
|
7
|
|
Initial weight (kg)
|
15.4
|
16.3
|
16.3
|
|
14.7
|
16.3
|
16.5
|
|
Stover refused (g/kg offered)
|
152
|
427
|
571
|
|
51
|
318
|
526
|
|
Stover intake (g DM/kg BW/d)
|
19.9
|
26.3
|
29.1
|
|
22.1
|
31.1
|
32.5
|
|
Growth rate (g/d)
|
9.4
|
23.4
|
31.6
|
|
28.2
|
54.1
|
62.2
|
However,
such a feeding strategy allowing goats to reject about 50% of the straw offered
could be wasteful and the practice is justified only if the rejected straw could
also be recycled through animals (fed to less selective mature and large ruminants)
or used for some other purposes (e.g., as a source of fuel in the case of maize
and sorghum stovers). The refusals can also be used for bedding and(or) incorporated
in the soil, which could enhance the complementarity of crop and goat production.
However, refused stovers, which would tend to be dominated by the stem fraction,
would contain high C:N ratios and could be slow to decompose under field conditions.
In the future, rejected straws and stovers (from generous feeding) might have
a value for industrial processing into products such as paper products, hard
boards, egg trays, etc.
5.2 Urea Treatment
Urea
treatment consists of spraying a solution of urea onto a dry mass of straws
and stovers and covering with locally available materials in order to form a
hermetic seal. Urea treatment is a relatively simple method of chemical treatment
of crop residues. If the ambient temperature is sufficiently warm, the urea
hydrolyzes to gaseous ammonia and carbon dioxide in the presence of water and
the enzyme urease. The optimum application rate of urea is between 4 and 6 kg
of urea per 100 kg of straw on a dry matter basis. The ideal moisture content
and ambient temperature for ureolysis lie between 30 and 50% and 30 and 400C,
respectively. In a typical tropical climate, treatment can be completed in a
2-3 week period. However, a longer period might be required at higher altitudes
(Chenost and Kayouli, 1997). Urea treatment improves the nitrogen content, digestibility
and DM intake of the low quality roughages by ruminants. The technique has been
successfully used in China and south east Asia with beneficial results. However,
the degree to which animal performance could be improved by urea treatment is
limited (Animut et al., 2000), primarily to that resulting from hemicellulose
solubilization and accompanying increase in ruminal fiber digestion and(or)
intake. Likewise, the efficiency of utilization of nitrogen added in the process
may not be high without dietary addition of other feedstuffs because of the
relatively high ratio of ruminally available nitrogen to ruminally fermentable
organic matter. Moreover, availability and price of urea could be a limiting
factor hindering adoption of the technique in many African countries.
5.3 Thinning and Leaf Stripping from Maize and
Sorghum
The
interactions between crop and livestock production systems are very strong in
densely populated and intensively cultivated mixed farming areas. Thinning
and leaf stripping from cereal crops such as maize and sorghum could serve as
important sources of feed. Usually farmers use a high seeding rate as a safeguard
against germination losses and the extra seedlings are eventually thinned out
at weeding and are useful sources of feed, particularly for small ruminants.
A survey conducted in Hararghe highlands of eastern Ethiopia (Abate and Yami,
2000) revealed that thinning of maize could provide as much as 67-89% of the
diet of fattening oxen during the months of August-September, whereas thinning
of sorghum provided about 44-55% of the diet during the months of October and
November. A study conducted in western Kenya showed that between 350 and 1000
kg DM/ha can be generated from maize crop with a mean crude protein content
and in vitro DM digestibility of 210 g/kg and 59%, respectively. Additional
feed can be produced after the silking stage from those plants that will have
aborted or failed to set seed (Oteino et al., 1992).
The
study from western Kenya also showed that leaf stripping of maize could begin
about 90 days after planting with the removal of one leaf per plant per week,
starting with the bottom leaves. According to Oteino et al. (1992) four leaves,
including the flag leaf and the leaves subtending the cob, should be left on
each plant. If properly implemented this procedure can give about 800 kg DM/ha.
With a crude protein content of 12.8% and in vitro DM digestibility of 64%,
fresh maize leaves have higher nutritive value than grass hay (Oteino et al.,
1992; Semenye et al., 1993). Abate and Yami (2000) also showed that leaf stripping
from maize and sorghum plays a significant role in the diets of fattening oxen
in the Hararghe highlands.
6. Proper Exploitation of Natural Browse
In
many parts of east Africa, farmers and pastoralists traditionally lop branches
of trees and use them as supplementary feed for their animals during the dry
season. Tree foliage has been used as animal feed since the early days of human
history and is being increasingly recognized as a potentially high quality feed
resource for ruminants, particularly as a source of protein (Leng, 1997). The
leaves and pods from naturally occurring trees (natural browses) are sources
of good quality feed during the dry season when herbaceous forages are in short
supply. Foliage from trees and shrubs appears to be the preferred forage for
goats. In harsh and arid conditions, trees provide more edible biomass than
pasture and the biomass remains green and high in protein when pastures dry
off and senesce. Trees can tap water and nutrients deep in the soil profile
because of their deep-rooted nature. The leaves and pods from fodder trees and
shrubs usually have a higher crude protein and a lower fiber content than dry
grass forages and cereal crop residues.
Thus,
proper and strategic use of these feed resources as supplementary feed during
the dry season can help to minimize seasonal fluctuation in productivity. Considering
the increasing human population, shrinkage of pastureland and deceasing availability
of land for forage production and, the cost and unreliable availability of oil
seed cakes, tree foliages have immense potential as protein and energy supplements
to improve productivity of goats and other ruminants during the dry season.
However, the gradual decrease in the number of browse trees and shrubs and inadequate
management systems to optimize utilization of the existing trees and shrubs
appears to be a problem in this regard. Thus, efforts should be made to improve
the availability of browse during the dry season by planting browse trees and
maintaining the necessary balance of the species present by selective bush clearing
and making browse available to the goats either by trimming or lopping leaves
and branches and beating down fruits or pods.
7. Conclusion
Natural
pastures and agricultural byproducts are the main feed resources for goat production
in east Africa. Grazing and browsing on natural pastures is the main source
of feed in the arid and semi-arid pastoral areas, whereas crop residues could
contribute up to 50% of the total feed supply in areas where mixed crop-livestock
production is the dominant mode of production. The quantity and quality of fodder
available from natural pasture shows seasonal fluctuation. Thus, effective utilization
of the available feed resources (crop residues, natural pastures and browse)
and appropriate supplementation of poor quality natural pasture and crop residue
based diets appear to be the necessary steps to alleviate the nutritional problems
of goats in the region. Evaluation of the nutritive value of naturally occurring
tree leaves and pods, which are commonly used as dry season feed resources,
would be important to enhance their proper utilization.
References
Abate, F., Yami, A., 2000. The feed resource
base and feeding management of the traditional draught oxen fattening practice
by smallholder farmers in the eastern Hararghe highlands. In: Livestock production
and the environment Implications for sustainable livelihoods. Proceedings
of the 7th annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production
(ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 26-27 May 1999. pp. 179-188.
Abebe, G., Merkel, R.C., Sahlu, T., 2000. Enhancing
food security and income generating potential of families in southern Ethiopia
through improved goat production and extension. In: Merkel, R.C., Abebe, G.,
Goetsch, A.L. (Eds.), The Opportunities and Challenges of Enhancing Goat production
in East Africa. Proceedings of a Workshop held at Debub University, Awassa,
Ethiopia. Debub University, Awassa, Ethiopia and Langston University, Langston,
Oklahoma, USA.
Aboud, A.A.O., Owen, E., Reed, J.D., Said, A.N.,
McAllan, A., 1991. Feeding sorghum stover to Ethiopian sheep and goats: effect
of amount of offered on growth, intake and selection. Anim. Prod. 52: 607 (Abstract).
Aboud, A.A.O., Owen, E., Reed, J.D., Said, A.N.,
1993. Influence of amount of feed offered on growth, intake and selectivity:
observations on sheep and goats. In: Lebbie, S.H.B., Rey. B., Irungu, E.K. (Eds.),
Small Ruminant Research and Development in Africa. Proceedings of the
Second Biennial Conference of the African Small Ruminant Research Network, AICC,
Arusha, Tanzania, 7-11 December 1992. ILCA (International Livestock Centre for
Africa)/CTA (Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Co-operation). ILCA,
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 268 pp.
Anderson, F.M., 1987. Farmer circumstances in Ethiopia
and the improvement of animal feed resources. In: Kategile, J.A., Said A.N.,
Dzowela, B.H. (Eds.), Animal feed resources for small-scale livestock
producers. Proceedings of the second Pastures Network for Eastern and Southern
Africa (PANESA) workshop, held at the International Laboratory for Research
on Animal Diseases, Kabete, Nairobi, Kenya, 11-15 November 1985, IDRC (International
Development Research Centre) Manuscript Report.
Animut, G., Merkel, R.C., Abebe, G., Sahlu, T., Goetsch,
A.L., 2000. Broiler litter and urea-treated wheat straw as feedstuffs for Alpine
doelings. In: Merkel, R.C., Abebe, G., Goetsch, A.L. (Eds.), The Opportunities
and Challenges of Enhancing Goat production in East Africa. Proceedings of a
Workshop held at Debub University, Awassa, Ethiopia. Debub University, Awassa,
Ethiopia and Langston University, Langston, Oklahoma, USA.
Anindo, D., Toé, F., Tembely, S., Mukasa-Mugerwa,
E., Lahlou-Kassi, A., Sovani, S., 1998. Effect of molasses-urea block (MUB)
on dry matter intake, growth, reproductive performance and control of gastrointestinal
nematode infection of of grazing Menz ram lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 27,
63-71.
Chenost, M., Kayouli, C., 1997. Roughage Utilization
in Warm Climates. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 135, FAO, Rome. 226
pp.
Ebro, A., Sisay, A., Aredo, T.A., 1998. Effect
of level of substitution of lablab (Dolichos lablab) for concentrate on growth
rate and efficiency on post weaning goats. In: Women and Animal Production;
Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of animal
Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 14-15 May 1998. ESAP, Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia. Pp. 264-269.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations), 1997. FAO Production Yearbook 1996 Vol. 50, FAO, Rome.
Goetsch, A.L., Aiken, G.E., 2000. Broiler litter
in ruminant diets Implications for use as a low-cost byproduct feedstuff for
goats. In: Merkel, R.C., Abebe, G., Goetsch, A.L. (Eds.), The Opportunities
and Challenges of Enhancing Goat production in East Africa. Proceedings of a
Workshop held at Debub University, Awassa, Ethiopia. Debub University, Awassa,
Ethiopia and Langston University, Langston, Oklahoma, USA.
ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa).
1988. ILCA Annual Report 1987. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ingratubun, G.F., Owen, E., Massawe, N.F., Mtenga,
L.A., Mtengeti, E.G., 2000. Effect of upgrading small East African goats on
feed resource utilization in the Uluguru mountains in Tanzania; a farmers perspective.
Livestock Research for Rural Development 12(3), 11 pp.
Leng, R.A., 1997. Tree Foliage in Ruminant Nutrition. FAO Animal Production
and Health Paper 139, FAO, Rome.
Kabaija, E., Little, D.A., 1988. Nutrient quality
of forages in Ethiopia with particular reference to mineral elements. In: African
forage plant genetic resources, evaluation of forage germplasm and extensive
livestock production systems. Proceedings of the Third Workshop held at the
International Conference Centre, Arusha, Tanzania, 27-30April 1987. ILCA, Addis
Ababa.
Macala, J., Molefe, V., Sebolai, B., Laletsang,
K., 1996. Effect of supplemental peanut hay on performance of lactating Tswana
does and kids post-weaning. In: Ndikumana, J., de Leeuw P (Eds.), Sustainable
Feed production and Utilization for Smallholder Livestock Enterprises in Sub-Saharan
Africa. Proceedings of the Second African Feed Resources Network (AFRNET), Harare,
Zimbabwe, 6-10 December 1993. AFRNET, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 123-130.
Ngambi, J.W.W., Kekena-Monare, L., 1996. Improving
wheat straw intake by goats. In: Ndikumana, J., de Leeuw P (Eds.), Sustainable
Feed production and Utilization for Smallholder Livestock Enterprises in Sub-Saharan
Africa. Proceedings of the Second African Feed Resources Network (AFRNET), Harare,
Zimbabwe, 6-10 December 1993. AFRNET, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 97-99.
Norton, B.W., 1994. Tree legumes as dietary
supplements for ruminants. In: Gutteridge, R.C., Shelton, H.M. (Eds.), Forage
Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp.192-201.
Okello, K.L., Ebong, C., Opuda-Asibo, J. 1996.
Effect of feed supplements on weight gain and carcass characteristics of intact
male Mubende goats fed elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) ad libitum in Uganda.
In: Lebbie, S.H.B., Kagwini, E. (Eds.), Small Research and Development in
Africa. Proceedings of the Third Biennial Conference of the African Small
Ruminant Research Network, UICC, Kampala, Uganda, 5-9 December 1994. ILRI (International
Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya.
Onim, J.F.M., Fitzhugh, H.A., Getz, W.R., 1992.
Developing and using forages. In: Semenye, P.P., Hutchcroft, T. (Eds.), On-farm
Research and technology for Dual-purpose Goats. SR-CRSP (Small Ruminant Collaborative
Research Support Program) and KARI (Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI),
Kenya.
Oteino, K., Onim, J.F.M., Semenye, P.P., 1992.
Feed production and utilization by dual purpose goats in smallholder production
systems of western Kenya. In: Stares, J.E.S., Said, A.N., Kategile, J.A. (Eds.),
The complementarity of feed resources for animal production in Africa.
Proceedings of the joint feed resources networks workshop held in Gaborone,
Botswana, 4-8 March 1991. African Feeds Research Network. ILCA (International
Livestock Centre for Africa), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Owen, E., 1994. Cereal crop residues as feed
for goats and sheep. Livestock Research for Rural Development, Vol. 6, Number
1, 13 pp.
Preston, T.R., Leng, R.A., 1987. Matching Ruminant
Production Systems with Available Resources in the Tropics and Sub-tropics.
Penambul Books, Armidale, 245 pp.
Reynolds, L., 1989. Effects of browse supplementation
on the productivity of West African dwarf goats. In: Wilson, R.T., Azeb, M.
(Eds.), African Small ruminant research and development. Proceedings of a conference
held at Bamenda, Cameroon, 18-25 January 1989, ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Said, A.N., Tolera, A., 1991. Wheat straw utilization
in Ethiopia. In: Hailu Gebre-Mariam, Tanner, D.G., Mengistu Hulluka (Eds.),
Wheat Research in Ethiopia: A historical perspective. Addis Ababa, IAR/CIMMYT,
pp. 353-378.
Semenye, P.P., Shisya, M., Getz, W.R., 1993.
Overcoming the constraints of dry matter intake on dual-purpose goat production
by feeding defoliated maize leaves. In: Lebbie, S.H.B., Rey. B., Irungu, E.K.
(Eds.), Small Ruminant Research and Development in Africa. Proceedings
of the Second Biennial Conference of the African Small Ruminant Research Network,
AICC, Arusha, Tanzania, 7-11 December 1992. ILCA (International Livestock Centre
for Africa)/CTA (Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Co-operation).
ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 268 pp.
Tessema, S., Emjong, E.E., 1984. Utilization
of maize and sorghum stover by sheep and goats after quality improvement by
various and supplements. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 44:Supp.,
408-415.
Tolera, A., Said, A.N., 1994. Assessment of
feed resources in Welayta Sodo: Quantity estimation and laboratory evaluation.
Ethiop. J. Agric. Sci. 14: 69-87.
Tolera, A., Sundstøl, F., 2000. Supplementation
of graded levels of Desmodium intortum hay to sheep feeding on basal diets of
maize stover harvested at three stages of maturity 1. Feed intake, digestibility
and body weight change. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 85, 239-257.
Citation:
Tolera, A., R.C. Merkel,
A.L. Goetsch, T. Sahlu and T. Negesse. 2000. Nutritional constraints and future
prospects for goat production in East Africa. In: R.C. Merkel, G. Abebe and
A.L. Goetsch (eds.). The Opportunities and Challenges of Enhancing Goat Production
in East Africa. Proceedings of a conference held at Debub University, Awassa,
Ethiopia from November 10 to 12, 2000. E (Kika) de la Garza Institute for Goat
Research, Langston University, Langston, OK pp. 43-57.
|