|
GROWTH AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF BARBARI KIDS AS INFLUENCED
BY CONCENTRATE SUPPLEMENTATION
Ameha
Sebsibea and M.M Mathurb
aSheno Research Center,
P.O.Box 112 Debre Berhan, Ethiopia bDepartment of Animal
Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Jabalpur-482001 (M.P), India
Abstract
Castrated Barbari kids with an average age of 5
months were used to evaluate effects of different feeding regimes, i.e., tree
leaves mixture (TLM) ad lib (T1), TLM ad lib + C (T2) and TLM + G (1:1) ad
lib + C (T3) under stall fed conditions on body weight, growth rate, body measurements,
carcass yield, carcass physical composition and non-carcass components. TLM
consisted of equal proportions of Pipal (Ficus religiosa), Gular (F.
glomerata) and Pakar (F. infectoria), C was concentrate supplement
primarily composed of maize, groundnut cake and wheat bran and G was natural
grass given in a 1:1 ratio with TLM for Treatment 3. The TLM + concentrate
group had higher (P < 0.05) final body weight (19.6 vs 15.4 kg) and average
daily gain (60 vs 30 g) compared with the TLM group (P < 0.01), and statistically
T2 and T3 were similar. The overall mean final body measurements at the slaughter
age of 10 months were 57.7, 51.6, 57.2, 63.2, 25.4 and 31.3 cm for height, length,
heart girth, paunch girth, thigh and neck circumference. Among these measures,
body length (48.3 vs 53.3 cm) and neck circumference (29.3 vs 32.3 cm) were
increased (P < 0.05) by concentrate supplementation compared with the TLM
treatment. The T1 group had highest (P < 0.05) shrinkage loss (10.5%) after
fasting. Hot carcass weight ranged from 5.7 to 8.4 kg, dressing percentage
on fasted body weight was 41.5 to 45.6 and dressing percentage on empty body
weight basis was 48.2 to 49.8. Concentrate supplementation influenced carcass
weight (P < 0.05) and dressing percentage relative to fasted body weight
(P < 0.01). However, the effect of diet on dressing percentage relative
to empty body weight was not significant. Overall mean proportions of primal
cuts of the carcass were 32, 12.6, 13.2, 28.1 and 14% for leg, loin, rack, shoulder
and neck and breast and shank, respectively. The proportion of lean meat was
not affected by treatments. However, concentrate supplementation increased
(P<0.01) total fat percentage and reduced total bone proportion (P<0.05)
compared with TLM fed goats. Lean meat to bone ratio was 2.25:1, 2.42:1 and
2.36:1 for T1, T2 and T3, respectively. The corresponding value for the lean
meat to fat ratio was 10.3:1, 6.66:1 and 6.06 1, respectively. Both traits
were significantly affected by diet. Backfat thickness, loin-eye area and weights
of liver, kindeys, spleen and non-carcass fats were also significantly affected
by feeding regimes. It was concluded that stall-fed kids kept on TLM or TLM
+ natural grass should be supplemented with concentrate for higher growth rate
and better chevon production.
1. Introduction
Poor growth rate is a major factor limiting goat production,
and plane of nutrition can markedly improve weight gain. Goats spend more than
90% time in browsing on top feeds and hardly 10% on grazing, even when sufficient
top feeds are not available. Natural grasses as such or as hay could serve
as roughage sources for goats (Parthasarthy et al., 1998). Roughage alone does
not support optimal growth, due to insufficient protein and energy levels.
Top feeds are relatively rich in crude protein but poor in energy. However,
supplementation with readily fermentable energy sources like concentrates has
improved performance of kids (Paul et al., 1990). The present investigation
was conducted to evaluate influences of concentrate supplementation on body
weight, body measurements, growth rate and carcass characteristics of Barbari
goats in a feeding system based on tree leaves while in stall conditions.
2. Materials and Methods
The study was carried out at the College of Veterinary Science
and Animal Husbandry, Jabalpur, India. Sixteen castrated Barbari kids with an
average age of 5 months and body weight of 10.7 kg were randomly allotted to
three groups of 6, 5 and 5 kids each. The T1 treatment entailed feeding of
a tree leaves mixture (TLM) consisting of Pipal (Ficus religiosa), Gular
(F.glomerata) and Pakar (F.infectoria) in equal proportions (on
a fresh basis). The T2 treatment was TLM + concentrate mixture (45% maize,
31% groundnut cake, 21% wheat bran, 2% mineral mixture and 1% common salt 1%).
The T3 treatment consisted of TLM + natural grass (1:1) + concentrate. The
concentrate had calculated levels of 20% CP and 70% TDN and was given at the
rate of 300 g/d up to 15 kg body weight and thereafter at approximately 400
g/d until slaughter.
The tree leaves mixture was made into bundles and hung for
each kid in the individual pens to assist in plucking the leaves. They were
let loose 3-4 hours daily in the fenced paddock for exercise. Water and feeds
were given ad libitum to all animals, and mineralized salt lick was also given
ad libitum to the TLM group. Feedstuffs and offered diets were analyzed for
proximate constituents (AOAC, 1980) and for phosphorus and Calcium (Talapatra
et al., 1940).
The individual weight of the kid was recorded at fortnightly
intervals in the morning before watering and feeding. Similarly, measurements
were taken on the following body parts with a measuring tape: body length (point
of shoulder to the pinbone), body height (base of the hoof to the highest point
of the wither), heart girth, (circumference of the body immediately behind the
fore-legs), paunch girth (around the circumference of the umbilicus), neck girth
(circumference at the base of the neck) and thigh circumference (around the
middle of the thigh)
After feeding for 5 months, kids were slaughtered at an average
age of 10 months by Halal method for carcass evaluation. They were fasted for
24 hours from feed, however, water was available ad libitum. After bleeding
for an average of 5 minutes, skinning and evisceration was conducted similar
to routine commercial procedures. The carcass was disjointed into five primal
cuts, i.e., leg, loin, rack, shoulder and neck and breast and shank as per ISI
specification (1963). Weights of the hot and chilled carcass (4-60C
for 24 hours), edible offal components (liver, kidneys, heart and spleen), non-edible
offal components (blood, skin, head, lung with trachea, gastro-intestinal tract,
hooves, gall bladder (full) and ingesta) and non-carcass fat were recorded.
Measurements of loin-eye area and backfat thickness were also made using a planimeter
and scale, respectively. Statistical analysis was carried out using completely
randomized design (Snedecor and Cochran, 1967). Percentage values were also
transformed in to arcsine units for statistical analysis.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Proximate Composition
Results of chemical analysis (Table 1) for individual tree
leaves such as Gular, Pipal and Pakar for each of the proximate constituents
were very similar to reports of Banerjee (1991) and Majumdar and Momin (1960).
However, Ranjhan (1997) recorded a slightly higher CP value for Pakar. This
discrepancy might have been due to variation in the stage of harvest and the
fertility of the land.
3.2 Body Growth
The TLM + concentrate fed group had greater (P < 0.05)
final body weight (19.6 vs 15.4 kg) and average daily gain (60.3 vs 30 g) compared
with the TLM group (P < 0.01). Statistically, T2 and T3 were similar. A
similar significant improvement of kid performance (41.1 vs 18.2 g/d) was reported
due to concentrate supplementation of Barbari kids kept on khejri leaves (Nagpal
et al.,1990). The average daily gain recorded (33 g) with Berseem hay
fed to Barbari kids (Singh and Rekib, 1979) was also comparable to the value
obtained from TLM feeding (Table 2) in the present study.
The kids fed T2 and T3 had higher body height, heart girth,
paunch girth, thigh circumference, and body length and neck circumference than
the T1 group. The latter two measurements, however, were greater (P<0.05)
for groups receiving concentrate (53.3 for body length and 32.3 cm for neck
circumference) than for the TLM fed group (48.3 and 29.3 cm, respectively; Table
3). Hence, concentrate supplementation affected skeletal development of kids.
There was no statistical difference between the two supplemented groups (Table
3). The overall mean final body measurements were 57.72, 51.64, 57.21, 63.24,
25.38 and 31.25 cm for height, length, heart girth, paunch girth, thigh circumference
and neck circumference respectively when the dietary treatment values were averaged.
The average values for body height, heart girth and neck circumference are in
agreement with the report for male yearling goats of Kushwaha (1996)
Table 1. Proximate composition of experimental feeds (% DM basis)
|
Feeds
|
DM
|
CP
|
EE
|
CF
|
NFE
|
TA
|
Ca
|
P
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrate
|
90.25
|
21.52
|
4.10
|
9.02
|
57.56
|
7.80
|
0.17
|
0.75
|
|
N. grass
|
32.40
|
6.37
|
1.91
|
33.40
|
49.03
|
9.29
|
0.39
|
0.12
|
|
Gular
|
34.80
|
13.18
|
2.81
|
15.60
|
54.26
|
14.15
|
2.72
|
0.37
|
|
Pipal
|
36.80
|
9.23
|
3.20
|
25.20
|
46.27
|
16.10
|
3.25
|
0.20
|
|
Pakar
|
34.40
|
13.11
|
2.92
|
18.32
|
54.19
|
11.46
|
2.61
|
0.21
|
|
T1
|
39.70
|
12.08
|
3.07
|
21.70
|
49.75
|
13.40
|
2.60
|
0.23
|
|
T2
|
89.86
|
18.91
|
3.43
|
16.40
|
51.36
|
9.90
|
1.26
|
0.38
|
|
T3
|
91.00
|
16.00
|
3.35
|
19.30
|
51.65
|
9.70
|
0.87
|
0.41
|
Table 2. Average growth rates of Barbari kids fed different
feeding regimes
|
Dietary Group
|
Body weight
|
Gain
|
% increase in BW
|
| |
Initial
|
Final
|
|
|
| |
Kg
|
g/d
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
T1
|
10.85 ± 0.38
|
15.35a
±0.79
|
30.0a ±3.4
|
41.5
|
|
T2
|
10.60 ± 1.34
|
19.64b
±1.52
|
60.3b ±3.3
|
85.3
|
|
T3
|
10.64 ± 1.00
|
18.08ba
±1.11
|
49.6b ±5.3
|
69.9
|
Column means bearing different
superscripts differ significantly
Table 3. Mean final body measurements (cm) of Barbari kids
under different feeding systems
|
Parameter
|
T1
|
T2
|
T3
|
Pooled mean
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Height
|
54.75 ±0.74
|
59.60 ±2.31
|
58.80 ±0.86
|
57.72
|
|
Length
|
48.33a
±0.91
|
52.80b±1.69
|
53.80b±1.10
|
51.64
|
|
Heart girth
|
54.83 ±0.80
|
58.80 ±1.93
|
58.00 ±1.15
|
57.21
|
|
Paunch girth
|
61.92 ±1.22
|
64.50 ±2.23
|
63.30 ±1.02
|
63.24
|
|
TC
|
23.33 ±0.87
|
26.70 ±1.06
|
26.10 ±1.06
|
25.38
|
|
NC
|
29.25a±0.44
|
32.90b±0.94
|
31.60b
±0.83
|
31.25
|
Means with different superscripts
in a row differ significantly (P<0.05)
TC= Thigh circumference
NC= Neck circumference
3.3 Carcass Characteristics
Hot carcass weight was higher (P < 0.05) in T2 (8.39 kg)
than in T1 (5.72 kg), and differences between T2 and T3 were not significant
(Table 4). Concentrate supplementation of the browsing of tree leaves increased
carcass weight (P < 0.01) in Beetal x Sirohi kids (Paul et al., 1990), and
also in Jamunapari goats fed L. leucocephala leaves (Srivastava and Sharma,
1997).
Dressing percentage based on fasted body weight was 41.5,
45.6 and 45.2 for T1, T2 and T3, respectively, which was affected (P < 0.01)
by supplementation with the concentrate mixture. However, the effect of diet
on dressing percentage based on empty body weight was nonsignificant (Table
4). The dressing percentages were within the range of the reported values for
Barbari kids (Agnihotri and Pal, 1997).
The mean fasting loss was 10.49, 6.20 and 5.78% in groups
T1, T2 and T3, respectively, and the difference was significant (P<0.05;
Table 4). A similar trend was observed in Muzaffarnagari lambs in which the
high and low roughage groups had 13.8 and 5.6% losses, respectively (Hyder et
al., 1979).
Pooled average proportions of the primal cuts were 32.0,
12.6, 13.2, 28.1 and 14.0% for leg, loin, rack, shoulder and neck and breast
and shank, respectively. None of the cuts were significantly affected by dietary
treatment. A similar trend was observed by Srivastva and Sharma (1997) in Jamunapari
goats. Percentage lean meat in each cut was not affected by diet. However,
numerically leg had the highest and breast and shank the lowest proportion of
lean meat. The proportion of fat was higher (P < 0.01) in loin, rack, shoulder
and neck for T2 and T3 vs T1 (Table 5). Similar observations also confirmed
that the percentage of fat increased significantly with increase in energy level
(Bhuyan et al., 1996)
Concentrate supplementation resulted in a higher (P <
0.05) lean meat to bone ratio (2.42:1) than sole feeding of TLM (2.25:1; Table
4). Likewise, Prasad et al. (1980) reported a significant effect of concentrate
supplementation on meat:bone ratio. The lean meat to fat ratio was higher (P<0.05)
for the TLM group than for groups supplemented with concentrate (Table 4), probably
due to the lowest fat proportion in the TLM fed kids. Concentrate supplementation
resulted in higher (P < 0.01) backfat thickness (1.36 mm) and loin eye area
(9.65 cm2) compared with the TLM group (0.5 mm and 6.23 cm2)
The percentage of edible offal components (slaughter weight
basis) was not significantly influenced by the supplementation (Table 6). Kumar
et al. (1991) also reported that dietary variation did not affect the percentage
of liver, kidneys, heart and spleen of Gaddi goats.
The proportions of head and ingesta with excreta were lower
(P < 0.01) and other proportions (blood, empty alimentary tract and hooves)
were also lower for concentrate supplemented groups (Table 6). Noncarcass proportions
of individual parts (skin, blood, and ingesta with excreta) reported by Pal
and Agnihotri (1999) for Barbari kids are in agreement with the present findings.
Diet significantly influenced the weights of kidney (P < 0.05) and mesentric
fat (P < 0.01; Table 6).
4. Conclusion
Concentrate supplementation significantly improved growth
rate and carcass yield over the sole feeding of TLM. Thus, stall-fed Barbari
kids maintained on TLM or TLM + natural grass can be supplemented with concentrate
for higher growth rate and chevon production.
Table 4. Carcass characteristics of stall-fed Barbari kids
as affected by feeding regimes
|
Characteristics
|
T1
|
T2
|
T3
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Initial body weight
(kg)
|
10.85
±0.38
|
10.60
±1.34
|
10.64
±1.00
|
|
Final body weight (kg)*
|
15.35a±0.79
|
19.64
b ±1.52
|
18.08ba ±1.11
|
|
Shrunk body weight (kg)*
|
13.75a
±0.76
|
18.44
b ±1.48
|
17.04ba ±1.07
|
|
Empty body weight (EBW)
(kg)*
|
11.85a
±0.66
|
16.87
b ±1.28
|
15.56b ±0.97
|
|
Fasting Loss (%)*
|
10.49a
±1.28
|
6.20
b ±0.72
|
5.78b
±1.17
|
|
Hot carcass weight (HCW)
(kg)*
|
5.72a
±0.36
|
8.39
b ±0.66
|
7.71b
±0.52
|
|
Chilled carcass weight
(kg)*
|
5.69a ±0.34
|
8.31b ±0.65
|
7.63b
±0.49
|
|
Dressing % on FBW**
|
41.52a
±0.46
|
45.55b ±0.28
|
45.18b
± 0.20
|
|
Dressing % on EBW
|
48.19±0.48
|
49.75 ±0.43
|
49.45± 0.21
|
|
Total lean meat (%)
|
64.56 ±0.23
|
63.55 ±0.15
|
62.69±0.34
|
|
Total fat (%)**
|
6.27a
±0.82
|
9.88b ±0.89
|
10.52b ±0.64
|
|
Total bone (%)*
|
28.83a
±0.29
|
26.32b ±0.50
|
26.63b ±0.25
|
|
Meat:bone*
|
2.25:1a
±0.04
|
2.42:1b ± 0.07
|
2.36:1ba± 0.04
|
|
Meat:Fat*
|
10.30:1a ±1.18
|
6.66:1b±0.61
|
6.06:1b±0.40
|
|
Back fat thickness (mm)**
|
0.50a
±0.04
|
1.36b ±0.07
|
1.26b ±0.08
|
|
Loin eye area (cm2)**
|
6.23a±0.54
|
9.65b
±0.94
|
10.0b±0.98
|
Shrunk BW= Fasted BW= Slaughter body weight
a,b row values with different superscript differ significantly. *P<0.05;
**P<0.01
EBW= Fasted BW-GIT contents
Table 5. Mean proportion of lean meat, fat and bone of different
primal cuts (%)
|
Traits
|
Tr
|
Leg
|
Loin
|
Rack
|
Shoulder and Neck
|
Breast and Shank
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meat
|
T1
|
68.86±
0.25
|
67.95± 0.37
|
64.30 ±0.27
|
64.75 ±0.42
|
56.94 ±0.45
|
| |
T2
|
69.64
±0.59
|
65.13 ±0.55
|
61.92±
0.81
|
63.83 ±0.15
|
57.23 ±0.72
|
| |
T3
|
67.40
± 0.70
|
65.00 ±0.50
|
61.83
±0.34
|
64.48 ±0.50
|
54.75 ±0.40
|
|
Fat
|
T1
|
4.85
±0.94
|
7.69a±0.76
|
3.23a
±0.84
|
7.18a
±1.16
|
8.43
±0.96
|
| |
T2
|
6.89
±1.47
|
14.46b±0.83
|
7.07b±
0.95
|
11.09b
±0.79
|
9.92
±1.35
|
| |
T3
|
6.75
± 0.76
|
14.46b±0.68
|
7.95b±
1.35
|
11.14b
±1.19
|
12.31 ±0.57
|
|
Bone
|
T1
|
26.17a±0.47
|
23.55a±0.31
|
32.47 ±0.48
|
27.31 ±0.67
|
34.63 ±0.34
|
| |
T2
|
22.95b±0.26
|
20.16b±0.08
|
31.00 ±1.29
|
24.74 ±0.68
|
32.77 ±0.68
|
| |
T3
|
25.06ba±0.29
|
20.54b±0.13
|
30.23± 0.81
|
24.38 ±0.92
|
32.94 ±0.51
|
ab values with different superscript in a column for each
cut and trait differ significantly (P<0.01)
Table 6. Average offals (%) and weight of noncarcass fat
(g) of Barbari kids under different feeding regimes
|
Traits
|
T1
|
T2
|
T3
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Liver
|
1.90
±0.07
|
1.93
±0.24
|
2.07
±0.13
|
|
Kidneys
|
0.38
±0.07
|
0.37
±0.07
|
0.40
±0.06
|
|
Heart
|
0.44
±0.07
|
0.46
±0.13
|
0.45
±0.10
|
|
Spleen
|
0.19
±0.08
|
0.25
±0.16
|
0.22
±0.14
|
|
Edible offals (total)
|
2.91
±0.03
|
3.01
±0.23
|
3.14
±0.08
|
|
Blood
|
5.20
±0.34
|
4.81
±0.41
|
4.98
±0.18
|
|
Head**
|
8.22a
±0.33
|
7.04
±0.33
|
6.97b±0.12
|
|
Skin
|
8.52
±0.27
|
9.08
±0.42
|
8.76
±0.30
|
|
Ingesta + excreta **
|
13.82a±0.67
|
8.39b±0.74
|
8.64b±0.35
|
|
Lung + trachea
|
1.21±0.16
|
1.21±0.20
|
1.20±0.23
|
|
EAT
|
9.67±0.42
|
9.15±0.52
|
9.29±0.54
|
|
Gall Bladder (Full)
|
0.08±0.10
|
0.10±0.09
|
0.10±0.10
|
|
Hooves
|
2.13±0.20
|
2.09±0.21
|
0.10±0.14
|
|
Kidneys fat*
|
36.5a±8.29
|
133.2b±32.33
|
111.4b±22.38
|
|
Heart fat
|
38.17±6.04
|
77.4±20.00
|
52.2 ±6.00
|
|
Mesentric fat**
|
180.17a±25.11
|
481.40b±83.95
|
344.6ba±57.15
|
EAT = Empty alimentary tract
ab values with different superscripts in a row differ significantly, * P<0.05; **P<0.01
References
Agnihotri, M.K., Pal, U.K., 1997. Carcass characteristics
and composition of Barbari male goats. Indian Veterinary Journal. 74, 403-406.
A.O.A.C., 1980. Official Methods of analysis 13th Ed. Association
of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.
Banerjee, G.C., 1991. A textbook of Animal Husbandry. 7th
Ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi.
Bhuyan, R., Baruah, K.K., Das, P.C., 1996. Growth response
and carcass characteristics of cross-bred kids fed rations having different
concentrate to roughage ratios. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 13(3),
167-169.
Hyder Ali, M.D., Ranjhan, S.K., Pathak, N.N., 1979. Effect
of different dietary energy levels supplied through various roughage to concentrate
ratio on the mutton production and carcass quality of intensively fed Muzaffarnagri
lambs. Indian Journal of Animal Science 49 (9),717-721.
I.S.I., 1963. Indian Standard Specification for mutton and
goat flesh: Fresh, chilled and frozen. IS. 2536. Indian Standards Institution.
New Delhi.
Kumar, S., Tiwari, S.P., Narang, M.P., 1991. Effect of different
planes of nutrition on carcass characteristics in Gaddi goats. Indian Veterinary
Journal 68,953-956.
Kushwaha, R.S., 1996. Studies on carcass characteristics
of indigenous yearling goats.M.V.Sc. and A.H. thesis, J.N.K.V.V., Jabalpur,
India.
Majumdar., B.N, Momin, S.A., 1960. Studies on tree leaves
as cattle fodder: the nutritive value of young Gular leaves (F.glomerata).
Indian Journal of Dairy Science 13,16-19.
Nagpal, A.K., Singh, D., Rawat, P.S., 1990. Growth performance
of weaner kids under different feeding systems in semi-arid tropics. Indian
Journal of Animal Production and Management 6(3),162-163.
Pal, U.K., Agnihotir, M.K., 1999. Effect of age by carcass
weight classification on carcass traits, cutability and fat-partitioning of
Barbari male goats. Indian Journal of Animal Science. 69(4), 255-257.
Parthasarthy, R., Murugan, M., Kathaperumal, V., 1998. Effect
of feeding top feeds on performance and nutrient utilization in small ruminants.
National seminar on integration of livestock and agro-forestry systems in waste
land development. 19-21 Jan. 1998. Tamil Nadu.
Paul, S., Sahu,B.B., Singh, D., Rawat, P.S., 1990. Effect
of birth, weaning age, and concentrate supplementation on growth and chevon
production. Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management 6(4),182-186.
Prasad, R.D., Bohra, S.D.J., Singh, K.N., Venkateswarlu,
K., 1980. Effect of supplementary feeding on the growth rate and carcass triats
of yearling sheep males. Indian Veterinary Journal 57, 407-410.
Ranjhan, S.K., 1997. Animal Nutrition and Feeding Practices.
5th revised edition. Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi.
Singh, C., Rekib, A., 1979. Effect of feeding natural grass
and Berseem hay on the growth rate and nutrient utilization by Barbari kids.
Indian Veterinary Journal 56,784-788.
Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G., 1967. Statistical Methods.
6th Ed. Oxford and IBH Publ. Co., Calcutta.
Srivastava, S.N.L., Sharma, K., 1997. Effect of feeding pelleted
Leuceana leucocephala leaves on the carcass traits of Jamunapari goats.
Indian Journal of Animal Science 67(2),165-167.
Talapatra, S.K., Ray, S.C, Sen, K.C., 1940. The analysis
of minerals constituents in biological materials. 1. Estimation of Phosphorus,
chlorine, Calcium, Magnesium, Sodium and Potassium in food stuff. Indian Journal
of Veterinary Science. & Animal Husbandry 10,243.
Citation:
Sebsibe, A. and M.M. Mathur. 2000.
Growth and carcass characteristics of Barbari kids as influenced by concentrate
supplementation. In: R.C. Merkel, G. Abebe and A.L. Goetsch (eds.). The Opportunities
and Challenges of Enhancing Goat Production in East Africa. Proceedings of
a conference held at Debub University, Awassa, Ethiopia from November 10 to
12, 2000. E (Kika) de la Garza Institute for Goat Research, Langston University,
Langston, OK pp. 144-150.
|