E de la Garza Institute for Goat Research Langston University
Workshops & Field Day Newsletter Newsletter Subscription Demonstrations Demonstrations Langston University Research Building
Goat Menu
 

extension
extension
research
other
library
quiz
search
about
contact
faculty

bar

 

Relationships between body composition and shrunk body weight and urea space in growing goats

T. Wuliji, A. L. Goetsch, R. Puchala, T. Sahlu, R. C. Merkel, G. Detweiler, S. Soto-Navarro, J. Luo, and T. Shenkoru

Journal of Applied Animal Research. 23:1-24. 2003

In order to accurately estimate nutrient requirements of livestock, it is desirable to know the composition of tissue accreted or lost. Much less information on body composition of goats is available relative to that for other ruminant species such as cattle and sheep. The cost and labor associated with harvest and the determination of chemical composition of the whole body or carcass and noncarcass components are high. Furthermore, such measures are terminal, necessitating assumptions of similar composition of other animals at later times in serial slaughter experiments. Therefore, there is need for simple, inexpensive and non-terminal means of assessing body composition of goats. In this regard, growing Spanish wethers and doelings (31; initial age of 3.5 mo) consumed ad libitum diets differing in quality continuously for 18 wk or with an increase in quality after 9 wk. Urea space (US), shrunk body weight (SBW) and chemical composition of the whole body were determined at the beginning, middle and end of the experiment. In addition, at the beginning of the experiment the same determinations were made with two yearling Boer Spanish doelings that had consumed a high quality diet ad libitum for 12 wk. SBW accounted for most variation in body composition of growing goats of this experiment. Nonetheless, small improvements in explained variability resulted from inclusion of US in equations for water and fat. Equations yielding best prediction of body composition of weaned goats were: water (kg) = 1.274 + (0.1546 US, kg) + (0.5782 SBW, kg) - (0.0043 SBW2, kg); fat (kg) = -0.921 - (0.1520 US, kg) + (0.1564 SBW, kg) + (0.0064 SBW2, kg); protein (% water) = 34.696 - (0.1175 predicted water, %); and ash (% water) = 0.0448 predicted water, %. However, utility of such equations at present may primarily be for within experiment treatment comparisons or for assessing changes in composition.


 

Extension Activities   |   Research Activities   |   Other Activities
Library Activities   |   Quiz   |   Search   |   About Us   |   Contact Us   |   Faculty & Staff
Research Extension Home   |   Top of Page

Copyright© 2000 Langston University   • Agricultural Research and Extension Programs
P.O. Box 730  • Langston, OK  73050 • Phone 405.466.3836