E de la Garza Institute for Goat Research Langston University
Workshops & Field Day Newsletter Newsletter Subscription Demonstrations Demonstrations Langston University Research Building
Goat Menu
 

extension
extension
research
other
library
quiz
search
about
contact
faculty

bar

 

Performance and forage selectivity of sheep and goats co-grazing grass/forb pastures at three stocking rates

G. Animut, A. L. Goetsch, G. E. Aiken, R. Puchala, G. Detweiler, C. R. Krehbiel, R. C. Merkel, T. Sahlu, L. J. Dawson, Z. B. Johnson, and T. A. Gipson

Small Ruminant Research 59:203-215. 2005.

Differences among ruminant species in forage selectivity offer potential for efficient utilization of pastures with diverse arrays of plant species. One common management strategy that may influence forage selectivity is stocking rate (SR). Therefore, this experiment was conducted to determine effects of SR on performance and forage selectivity of growing sheep and goat wethers co-grazing grass/forb pastures. Grazing was for 16 weeks in 2002 and 2003. Pastures consisted of various grasses, primarily bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), and forbs (e.g., ragweed; Ambrosia spp.). Sheep (Khatadin) and goats (? 75% Boer) averaged 21 ± 0.7 and 21 ± 0.5 kg initial BW, respectively, and were 4 to 5 months of age when grazing began. Stocking rates were four (SR4), six (SR6), and eight (SR8) animals per 0.4-ha pasture, with equal numbers of sheep and goats. The nine pastures (three/treatment) were divided into four paddocks for rotational grazing in 2-week periods. Forage mass (pre- and post-grazed) and composition of grass vs. forbs were determined by quadrat samples and transect analysis, respectively. BW was measured every 4 weeks and preference values for grass, forbs, and ragweed (10 = highest possible preference; 0 = consumption in proportion to availability; -10 = no consumption) were determined from fecal micrhistology and transect measures. There was a year x SR interaction (P < 0.05) in herbage DM mass before grazing (year 1: 2937, 3298, and 3351 kg/ha; year 2: 3033, 2928, and 2752 kg/ha for SR4, SR6, and SR8, respectively (SE = 174.4)). Post-grazed forage mass decreased linearly (P < 0.05) as SR increased (2279, 1693, and 1288 kg/ha for SR4, SR6, and SR8, respectively (SE = 109.7). In vitro true DM digestibility of pre-grazed forage samples was similar among SR, but SR x year interacted (P < 0.05) for post-grazed samples (year 1: 57.0, 54.4, and 53.5; year 2: 56.8, 49.0, and 48.3 for SR4, SR6, and SR8, respectively (SE = 2.16). Year and SR interacted (P < 0.05) in the percentage of grass in pastures post-grazing determined by transect (year 1: 64, 69, and 74%; year 2: 50, 66, and 73% for SR4, SR6, and SR8, respectively (SE = 8.4)). The preference for grasses was higher and that for total forbs and lower for sheep than for goats (P < 0.05). The preference value for ragweed, measured in year 2, was lower (P < 0.05) for sheep than for goats (-1.6 vs. 0.2) and increased linearly with increasing SR. Average daily gain tended (P < 0.10) to decrease linearly as SR increased (61, 51, and 47 g/day), and total BW gain per hectare increased linearly (P < 0.05; 610, 759, and 933 g/day for SR4, SR6, and SR8, respectively). In conclusion, post-grazing herbage mass greater than 1000 kg/ha at most measurement times suggests that decreasing forage availability with increasing SR may not have been primarily or solely responsible for the effect on ADG by limiting DM intake. Rather, the effect of SR on available forage mass could have limited the ability of both sheep and goats to compensate for the effect of SR on forage nutritive value.


 

Extension Activities   |   Research Activities   |   Other Activities
Library Activities   |   Quiz   |   Search   |   About Us   |   Contact Us   |   Faculty & Staff
Research Extension Home   |   Top of Page

Copyright© 2000 Langston University   • Agricultural Research and Extension Programs
P.O. Box 730  • Langston, OK  73050 • Phone 405.466.3836