Bucks were given a physical examination by Dr. Lionel Dawson, dewormed with Cydectin (moxidectin), deloused with Atroban De-Lice, given a preemptive injection of Nuflor for upper respiratory infections, and those bucks that needed booster or initial vaccinations for enterotoxemia and caseous lymphandinitis. Four weeks after check-in, all bucks were given a booster vaccination for enterotoxemia and caseous lymphandinitis.
Half of the bucks were randomly assigned within breeder to either Calan feeders or Feed Intake Recording Equipment (FIRE) system.
|Calan||Average of Entry Weight (lbs)||58.3|
|Fire||Average of Entry Weight (lbs)||55.8|
The performance-testing facility only has 53 Calan feeders but 56 bucks enrolled. To accommodate all animals, the new Feed Intake Recording Equipment (FIRE) system was used. The FIRE system is a completely automated electronic feeding system, which was developed for swine but we have adapted it to goats. Animals wear an electronic eartag, which is read by an antenna in the feeder. The FIRE system automatically records body weight and feed intake. This year, half of the bucks are in the FIRE system and half are in the Calan feeders. For producers, who enrolled more than one buck in the Buck Performance Test, the test supervisor randomly assigned half of their bucks to the FIRE system and half to the Calan feeders. The training period was much shorter for the FIRE system than for the Calan feeders. However, the bucks on the Calan feeders mastered the Calan feeders and are doing quite well. With the combined FIRE system and Calan feeders, the Oklahoma Buck Performance Test Buck now has a capacity of 100 bucks.
Because the FIRE system has not previously been used with goats, Langston University determined the appropriate stocking density per FIRE feeder. As many as 10 young goats can share a FIRE feeder and have similar performance to goats in the Calan system. Langston University also compared the FIRE system with the Calan feeders. We found no differences in average daily gain or feed intake of growing goats on the FIRE system and the well-established Calan feeders.
All bucks underwent an adjustment period of two weeks immediately after check-in. During the adjustment period, bucks were acclimated to the test ration and to the Calan feeders or to the FIRE system. For the Calan feeders, each buck wears a collar with an electronic "key" encased in hard plastic. The key unlocks the door to only one Calan feeder, thus enabling the buck to eat out of his individual feeder. Each morning, yesterday's feed that remains in the Calan feeder is weighed and removed from the Calan feeder. Fresh feed is weighted and placed into the Calan feeder. The difference in weights between the fresh feed place in the Calan feeder one morning and the remaining feed the next morning is the amount consumed. Because only one goat is capable of opening the Calan door and eating, it is possible to calculate the feed intake of the individual bucks. For the FIRE system, feed intake is automatically recorded every time a buck enters into the FIRE system to eat.
The area immediately around the Calan and FIRE feeders and waterers is concrete, however, the large majority of the inside pen is earth and is covered by pine shavings. Pine shavings were periodically added as needed to maintain fresh bedding. Bucks had free access to water provided by float-valve raised waterers. Whenever the weather was permitting, the bucks had access to the outside pens as well as the inside pens.
This year we were fortunate to hire a second year veterinary student from Oklahoma State University, Ms. Rebecca Whittington. Rebecca has done a wonderful job with the bucks.
There were three bucks that did not finish the test. One buck weighed only 22 lbs at entry, refused to eat despite veterinary inventions and died within several days. We had two goats from the same farm that had similar problem, septic arthritis of bacterial origin. The organism was Staphylococcus auricularis. It was resistant to most common antibiotics, but sensitive to a few specialized antibiotics. The veterinarians theorized that the organism probably gained entry through the navel at birth and resided in the joint until the joint was damaged by another buck beating on them and the organism grew and destroyed the joint. We had one hernia which was repaired and one abscess problem.
Nutritionists at Langston University formulated the following ration. In 1999, the amount of salt and ammonium chloride was doubled due to problems with urinary calculi the previous year. Except for the increase in salt and ammonium chloride, the ration was unchanged from that which was used in the first two meat buck performance tests. The ration was fed free-choice during the adjustment period and during the 12-week test.
|Ingredient||Percentage (as fed)|
|Pellet Partner (binder)||5.00%|
|Trace mineral salt||0.50%|
The crude protein content of the ration is 16% with 2.5% fat, 20.4% fiber and 60.6% TDN.Calcium phosphorus and sodium levels are .74%, .37% and 1.07%, respectively. Zinc concentration is 33.04 ppm, copper is 17.15 ppm and selenium is .21 ppm.. In 2003, competitive bids were sought for the buck-test feed and Bluebonnet Feeds of Ardmore, OK was awarded the contract to supply feed for the buck performance test for 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
In early 2000, the Oklahoma performance test was designated by the American Boer Goat Association Board of Directors as an ABGA Approved Performance Test. Qualified fullblood or purebred Boer bucks will be eligible to earn points towards entry into the "Ennobled Herd Book".Candidate bucks must pass a pre‑performance test inspection conducted by one (1) or more ABGA approved breeders.
Ten (10) points will be awarded a Boer buck who shows an average daily weight gain (ADG) in the top five percent (5%) of the animals on test. Five (5) points will be awarded a Boer buck who shows an average daily weight gain (ADG) in the next fifteen percent (15%) of the animals on test.All bucks must gain at least three‑tenths (.3) pounds per day to be awarded any points.
In 2003, the Oklahoma buck performance test was sanctioned by the International Boer Goat Association, Inc.
The Oklahoma performance test continues to grow and to serve the meat goat industry.
The official performance test started on May 31 after the adjustment period was finished. Weights at the beginning of the test averaged 67 lbs with a range of 39 to 112 lbs. Weights at mid-point averaged 94 lbs with a range of 70 to 139 lbs. Weights at the end of the test averaged 122 lbs with a range of 94 to 162 lbs. Weight gain for the test averaged 55 lbs with a range of 33 to 76 lbs.
The type of feeder (Calan or FIRE) had no significant effect upon gain. Figure 1 shows the weekly body weight gains for both feeder types over the course of the performance test.
For the test, the bucks gained on averaged 0.65 lbs/day with a range of 0.39 lbs/day to 0.90 lbs/day.
For the test, the bucks consumed an average of 358 lbs of feed with a range of 250 to 537 lbs.
The type of feeder (Calan or FIRE) had no significant effect upon intake. Bucks on the Calan system averaged 352 lbs intake and bucks on the FIRE system averaged 363 lbs, which is a difference of 11 lbs. over the 12-week period. Figure 2 shows the average daily intake for both feeder types over the course of the performance test.
For the test, the bucks averaged a feed efficiency of 6.66 (feed efficiency is defined as the number of lbs. of feed needed for one lbs. of gain), with a range of 4.84 to 11.11.
The average loin eye area as determined by ultrasonography was 1.82 square inches with a range of 1.38 to 2.78 square inches and the average left rear leg circumference was 16.4 inches with a range of 15.0 to 18.5 inches.
For 2006, the index was calculated using the following parameters:
30% on efficiency (units of feed per units of gain)
30% on average daily gain
20% on area of longissimus muscle (loin) at the first lumbar site as measured by real time ultrasound adjusted by the goat's metabolic body weight:
20% circumference around the widest part of the hind right leg as measuredwith a tailor's tape adjusted by the goat's metabolic body weight:
The adjustment to metabolic body weight gives lighter weight goats a fair comparison of muscling to heavier goats.
The deviation from the average of the parameters measured from the goats in the performance test was used in the index calculation. Thus, the average index score for bucks on-test was 100%.Bucks that are above average have indexes above 100% and those below average have index scores below 100%.
The Oklahoma Meat Goat Association and the Agricultural Research and Extension Program at Langston University congratulate:
Also, deserving congratulations are: Also, deserving congratulations are:
The Buck Test supervisor wishes to acknowledge Dr. Lionel Dawson of Oklahoma State University for his contributions as the admitting and on-call veterinarian, Ms. Rebecca Whittington for their management and oversight of the day-to-day activities, Mr. Jerry Hayes and Mr. Erick Loetz of Langston University for aid and supervision, Mr. Les Hutchens and his associates at Reproductive Enterprises, Inc. for conducting the ultrasound measurements for the loin eye area and the breeding soundness exams, and Bluebonnet Feeds of Ardmore, OK for custom mixing the feed.
2006 Buck Performance Test supervised by Dr. Steve Hart
Report prepared by Dr. Terry A. Gipson, Goat Extension Specialist, Langston University.
The Cooperative Extension Program at Langston University provides educational programs to individuals regardless of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, disability or status as a veteran. Issued in furtherance of Extension work, Act of September 29, 1977, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Extension Activities | Research Activities | Other Activities
Library Activities | Quiz | Search | About Us | Contact Us | Faculty & Staff
Research Extension Home | Top of Page
Copyright© 2000 Langston University Agricultural Research and Extension Programs
P.O. Box 730 Langston, OK 73050 Phone 405.466.3836